WAYS OF RENDERING THE LEXICO-GRAMMATICAL MEANINGS AND FUNCTIONS OF THE ENGLISH INFINITIVE

TRANSLATION OF ENGLISH VERBALS AND VERBAL CONSTRUCTIONS/COMPLEXES

Common English and Ukrainian non-finite forms of the verb, i.e., the infinitive and both participles, are characterized by identical functions in the sentence. Some of their lexico-grammatical mean­ings, however, are considerably broader in English than in Ukrainian and include the combined tense and aspect or tense, aspect and voice forms of the infinitive as well as of the present participle de­rived respectively from the intransitive and from transitive verbs (cf. to live - to be living, to have lived; but: to do - to be done, to be doing; doing - being done, having been done, etc.)

To render faithfully some of these lexico-grammatical mean­ings (semes) of English verbal paradigms into Ukrainian is not al­ways possible. An exception make the simple paradigms, which usu­ally have semantic and structural equivalents in both languages. For

example:

English Ukrainian
to ask —to be asked Запитувати - бути

запитаним,

working (Participle I) - працюючий, працюючи; having worked (Perfect Participle) - попрацювавши, пропрацювавши.

Translation of verbals depends not only on their structural, i.e., paradigmatic forms but also on their nature. Thus, a special approach is needed to render in Ukrainian the complexity of meanings con­tained by some paradigms of the English gerund (or to render the meanings of the Ukrainian diyepryslivnyk in English).

Consequently, the ways of rendering the meanings of verbals are predetermined by some factors which include a) the structural form of the verbal and b) the function of the verbal in the sentence,

where it may be either a single part of the sentence or a component of an extended part of the sentence.

Despite the differences in their morphological nature and lexi­cal meaning, some verbals may perform the same functions in Eng­lish sentences and in their corresponding Ukrainian syntaxemes. Hence, it is expedient to contrast the functions and meanings of Eng­lish and Ukrainian verbals in the corresponding sentences of these two languages.

WAYS OF RENDERING THE LEXICO-GRAMMATICAL MEANINGS AND FUNCTIONS OF THE ENGLISH INFINITIVE

Translation of the English infinitive is greatly predetermined by its form and sometimes by its function in the sentence. The infini­tive functioning as a single part of the sentence, i.e., not being a component of a secondary predication complex, has usually corre­sponding equivalents in Ukrainian. The latter are a single infinitive or infinitival phrase when the infinitive functions as 1. The subject:

It was pretty nice to get back to my room. /Salinger/

To get Irene out of London ... that was the thing. /Galsworthy/

There was no need to desribe

the Kelseys. (Christie)

2. The simple nominal predicate: «A gentleman to strike a lady!» (B.Shaw)

This function of the infinitive is often observed in Ukrainian
literary speech style, eg: Hi. He бути панам на Вкраїні!
(Сосюра)

Вже скоро бути бабиному літу. (Дмитерко)

3. Part of a compound predicate /or predicative:

No, you couldn't have called Hi, її не можна було назвати
her beautiful. (Mansfield) гарною.

... the company began to ...товариство заходилося/

mark the time. (LDurrel) розпочало відраховувати час.

Her next step was to speak її наступним кроком було

to Llewellyn. (Cronin) ^ поговорити з Ллевеллином.

«You will have to wait until you «Вам доведеться почекати.

hear from me again.» (Dreiser) доки я знову сповіщу про себе».

4. The Object (simple, extended or expanded):

~i- --- - - ,

Джулїі дуже подобалось тоді сидіти в затінку і дивитися на річку/воду.

Вона вчила його сидіти за столом і не класти на нього руки.

The infinitive has also its equivalents in Ukrainian when it is

used as a complement to an adjective or adjectivized past participle:

«I'm very glad to have seen «я дуже радий, що зуст-

you again...» (Cronin) рівся з вами знову/що побачив

вас знову...»

Very often the English infinitival object may have in Ukrainian an equivalent infinitival phrase introduced by the conjunction:

/ was too much disturbed to Я був аж надто стурбова-
go tQ bed. (C.P.Snow) ний, щоб іти спати.

5. An attribute (which is less often used in Ukrainian) as in the sen­tence below:

«Can I give you anything to «Дати вам щось поїсти чи.
eat or to drink?» (Lawrence) попити?»

Attributive infinitives can also be conveyed with the help of attributive subordinate clauses:

We made a list of things to be Ми склали список речей,
taken ... (Jerome) щоб узяти з собою/які візьме­
мо з собою.

This same attributive syntaxeme may also be translated as які/що треба було взяти з собою.

Some English attributive syntaxemes can be conveyed in Ukrainian with the help of an attributive subordinate clause:

«... he wasn't a sort of boy to «... він був не з тих хлопців,

bje moved from 3. purpose ... (Ibid.)

Some English attributive infinitives may have apart from sub­ordinate clauses or infinitival phrases also prepositional nouns for their semantic equivalents in Ukrainian:

... there were instructions to ... були дані інструкції до /
be carried out. (Cronin) для виконання (які треба було

виконати).

Note. This function of the infinitive is also observed in Ukrain­ian: мати бажання поїсти/щось випити. Він мав надію ще зустрітися.

6. An adverbial modifier (usually of purpose, result or con­sequence) may be conveyed in Ukrainian with the help of an infinitival щоб-phrase, a prepositional noun or a noun word-group:

She wanted time to, think it їй треба було часу для
over. (Galsworthy) обдумування/щоб обміркува­
ти це.

It was too dark to_ distinguish Було занадто темно, щоб
anything. (Lawrence) розрізняти що-небудь.

These were the main Ukrainian semantic equivalents for sin­gle English infinitives performing different functions in the sentence.